On Jan 6, 2011, at 17:24, John P. Hartmann wrote:
> That's exactly what sever does once eof has propagated through the orphaned
> stream.
>
I guess I just don't know how to cause an EOF to propagate.
The pipe:
* * * Top of File * * *
/* Rexx */ signal on novalue; /*
Doc: Does SEVER delete a stream?
*/
trace R
'addstream output FOO'
'addpipe *.output.FOO: | console'
'select output FOO'
'addpipe query | *.output:'
/* Does SEVER really undefine a stream? */
'sever output'
'addstream output FOO'
exit( 0 )
* * * End of File * * *
fails with:
5 *-* 'addstream output FOO'
>>> "addstream output FOO"
7 *-* 'addpipe *.output.FOO: | console'
>>> "addpipe *.output.FOO: | console"
8 *-* 'select output FOO'
>>> "select output FOO"
9 *-* 'addpipe query | *.output:'
>>> "addpipe query | *.output:"
11 *-* /* Does SEVER really undefine a stream? */
12 *-* 'sever output'
>>> "sever output"
13 *-* 'addstream output FOO'
>>> "addstream output FOO"
PIPCMD174E Stream "FOO" is already defined.
PIPMSG002I ... Processing "addstream output FOO".
+++ RC(174) +++
14 *-* exit( 0 )
>>> "0"
PIPINX086I CMS/TSO Pipelines, 5654-030/5655-A17 1.0112 (Version.Release/Mod) - G
enerated 3 Dec 2010 at 11:10:08
> On 7 January 2011 00:26, Paul Gilmartin <paulgboul...@aim.com> wrote:
>>
>> But, related question: Just because I'm compulsive, or fastidious,
>> or something, is there a way to discard a stream when I'm
>> done with it?
>>
>> I'm thinking about a scheme (possibly in a loop. Yah, I know;
>> non-pipethink) like:
>>
>> ADDSTREAM
>> ADDPIPE
>> ( do stuff )
>> SEVER /* is the pipe completely gone now? */
>> DELETESTREAM /* Leave no tracks. */
Thanks,
gil
