On Wed, 10 Aug 2011 20:16:32 -0600, gil wrote:
>It seems to me that there should be a more straightforward
>way than going out to CMD and back in to PIPE.  RUNPIPE would
>be close, but I can't seem to process the output from
>RUNPIPE.

You've got the two halves of the idea, but you need the right stage to
put them together:  Use PIPCMD to issue CALLPIPE, which can connect to
PIPCMD's input and output streams.

  'addpipe literal +05 callpipe query || *: ' ,
    '| delay'                                 ,
    '| not chop blank'                        ,
    '| pipcmd'                                ,
    '| insert /Reply is: / before'            ,
    '| cons'

¬R

Reply via email to