Rob van der Heij <[email protected]> wrote :- >> columns 78-81 being one of 3 values - but this would be easy in a separate
> | l: lookup 78.3 1.3 detail .. > \ literal CGA RMH IBM | split | l: Yes - that was the easy bit. That is one of at least 3 different ways I can think of doing it. I only mentioned it in case I was being obtuse and it could easily be incorporated into one stage with the other check. (I know I am often obtuse - but lets gloss over that). Colin Allinson Amadeus Data Processing GmbH
