On 09/23/2011 10:29 AM, Paul Gilmartin wrote: > In another context here recently here, John P. Hartmann hinted > that RANDOM does not meet requirements of modern cryptographic > strength.
Not having studied it beyond Wikipedia, I have to assume ARC4 doesn't either or it would be embargoed. Of course, if you want ARC4 itself and not just "something like" it, you could implement its PRNG in a REXX stage simply enough. ¬R
