Ahhh...somehow I reverted to the CMS version of PIPE (rather than the UPLEVEL, as specified by PICKPIPE). I'm good now.
Frank M. Ramaekers Jr. > -----Original Message----- > From: Frank M. Ramaekers > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 8:02 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: RE: [CMS-PIPELINES] How to locate a record, plus next 3 > > Hmmm.... not sure how mine is different: > > "|p:PICK FROM W1 == /TRACK/ COUNT 4", > > > FPLSPR054E Range "ROM" not valid > FPLSCA003I ... Issued from stage 6 of pipeline 1 > FPLSCA001I ... Running "PICK FROM W1 == /TRACK/ COUNT 4" > > Frank M. Ramaekers Jr. > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: CMSTSO Pipelines Discussion List [mailto:CMS- > > [email protected]] On Behalf Of John P. Hartmann > > Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 7:33 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [CMS-PIPELINES] How to locate a record, plus next 3 > > > > If there are more, you certainly want to explore PICK. > > > > |p: pick from w17.3 == /target 1/ count 3| > > > > \p: > > |q: pick from w17.3 == /target2/ count 4| > > > > On 07/24/2013 02:27 PM, Frank M. Ramaekers wrote: > > > Yeah, there's potential for more than one, but thanks for the pointers. > > > > > > Frank M. Ramaekers Jr. > > > > > >> -----Original Message----- > > >> From: CMSTSO Pipelines Discussion List [mailto:CMS- > > >> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Rob van der Heij > > >> Sent: Wednesday, July 24, 2013 7:20 AM > > >> To: [email protected] > > >> Subject: Re: [CMS-PIPELINES] How to locate a record, plus next 3 > > >> > > >> If there is just one such set that you care about, I'd use > > >> frtarget locate /rob/ | take 4 | x: if drop 3 | nlocate ,frank, > > >> | > > > x: > > >> If there's multiple sets I would mark them first and then use > > >> between > > >> > > >> Rob > > >> > > >> > > >> On 24 July 2013 14:10, Frank M. Ramaekers <[email protected]> > > >> wrote: > > >> > > >>> In this case, I'm looking for a particular string. When found, I > > > need > > >>> that record plus the next three. I don't see an easy way to do > > > this > > >>> with PIPEs. Somebody got a straight forward method? > > >>> > > >>> (Actually, I need the next three records, if the contents of the > > >>> 3rd record has a particular string, otherwise I need 4 records.) > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> TIA, > > >>> > > >>> Frank M. Ramaekers Jr. | Systems Programmer | Information > > >>> Technology > > > | > > >>> American Income Life Insurance Company | 254-761-6649 > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>
