Lookup is rarely the wrong solution ;-) Normally when I have something like that, I can duplicate the master records to have one for each key (say when you have a number of alias names for a the master). But then, I've also done wildcard lookup by generating a master for each of them ... If you can't point at the detail, you'd use the same trick (with fanout/juxtapose)
Rob On 25 March 2014 14:57, FAULHABER Michael < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi all! > > With the test > > Pipe(sep ! end ?)literal c!a:lookup ... !term?literal abc!a: > > I try to get a match _independent_ from the location of the detail within > the master. Currently I only get a match with lookup 1 3 because I know > the detail is in the 3rd position. But what to do when I do not know the > location within the master? > The test above is just an example, in real live I have about 25..32000 > details of 234 bytes length, I expect two of them to be contained in files > of up to 33k bytes. But where... > > What do you propose? Is lookup the wrong flyswatter? > > Ciao.....Mike > > ________________________________ > CONFIDENTIALITY : This e-mail and any attachments are confidential and may > be privileged. If you are not a named recipient, please notify the sender > immediately and do not disclose the contents to another person, use it for > any purpose or store or copy the information in any medium. >
