On 2014-04-16, at 03:17, FAULHABER Michael wrote:
>
> how about changing Trace "O" to Trace "R"?
>
For debugging/testing, yes.  I never code "trace O"; I generally
use the default, "trace N".  I'd use "trace E" except that pipeline
stages and EXECIO use non-zero return codes to indicate end-of-file,
which I don't believe should be reported as an error.

I've seen passionate arguments here for "trace O".  I disagree.

-- gil

Reply via email to