On Fri, 15 Mar 2019 at 04:39, Bishop, Peter <[email protected]> wrote:
> Replying to myself, I know, bad form... > > Anyway, here's my improved version which parses Q VSWITCH DET > What happened to the SNAKE in your code? Folks down their don't fear a snake, do they? ;-) If you come up with good function, we make you a "roo" stage too. Yours is a great example how you can use CMS Pipelines to shape things in an elegant way to fit your needs. I find myself even doing those things on the command line so I get the snippets that I need. Just like I would on Linux do "ifconfig | grep RX" But I sometimes wish my friends in CP development would spend less effort in shaping the CP response for appearance, as that tends to make parsing the output a lot harder. > Pipes are very neat and I would love to have them on my TSO systems but am not holding my breath... Just make sure you've voted for the RFE to show your interest. I'm eager to learn about use cases that you may have. I was delighted to see someone rank the upgrade of CMS Pipelines in z/VM 6.4 as one of his "top 5 things that happened to z/VM in two decades". I am not sure we'd have a similar adoption in TSO, but it would be good to prove the doubters wrong. Sir Rob the Plumber
