On Fri, 14 Jun 2019 at 03:18, Glenn Knickerbocker <[email protected]> wrote:
> > Those last two would have made a lot more sense the other way around. > My (recurring) wish is for a name for the existing behavior that's > sensible and documented. > I believe the child was born 25 years ago as MATCH, implemented like "not verify" with the complement set. I don't know why it was renamed NOT after some years. Maybe the keyword ANYOF would have been a good choice. There has been too much water through the pipe to remove the NOT option now, but it's hard to imagine how to document the behavior. I will poke the Piper in case he remembers why. Sir Rob the Plumber
