I think before this thread goes any further with respect to the technical
merits of Contribute, consider its intended audience. There are certainly
better packages out there that better fit the technical definition of CMS
(when combined with Dreamweaver). However, Contribute does fill a large
niche for those web site owners without the capability (undefined) of
implementing those other packages.
You want a web site built with a simple web tool? Contribute can do it all
by itself. You want a templated web site built with many different content
authors, supported by a technical person with limited site capabilities?
Dreamweaver and Contribute will suffice as a simple CMS.
Whatever floats your boat ...
Dennis
Geoff Deering
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.au> To
Sent by: [email protected]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] cc
rdsgroup.org
Subject
Re: [WSG CMS] Contribute as CMS?
12/02/2005 02:52
PM
Please respond to
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
roup.org
Martin and Merrilyn Curtis wrote:
> Hi
>
> First contribution to the list (no pun intended...).
>
> I have had some experience with using Contribute and setting it up for
> a client.
>
> Contribute is a page editor. It's not a site manager or a CMS. It's to
> be used (initially at least) in conjunction with Dreamweaver.
>
*********************************************************
The CMS discussion list for http://webstandardsgroup.org/
*********************************************************
