hemlock 3.5 doesn't (provide?)

[Thomas F. Burdick]

John Morrison writes:
 > 
 > Hi All;
 > 
 > CMUCL 18d (yeah, I know), Linux, Hemlock 3.5...
 > 
 > The problem is that executing the second of two:
 >      (require :hemlock)
 > forms lands me in the debugger.

Huh, it looks like a bug.  As a workaround, when Hemlock is loaded,
:hemlock is on *features*, so you could use:

  #-hemlock (require :hemlock)

instead.