On Wed, 23 Jun 2004, Oleg A. Paraschenko wrote:
> Here is an explanation why I need this functinality. Maybe a better way
> exists but I missed it. I want to write an embeddable implementation of
> a complex system. For development I use many Lisp features, these features
> are not required in runtime, so for runtime I want to use a minimal
> possible Lisp. The task is to get a code for the minimal Lisp from the
> development code.
Could you not just avoid compiling your code, macroexpand it, then
analyse that?
