>> "Raymond Toy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Oops. I can reproduce this. This is fixed in the latest snapshots; > I'm not sure the cause of this error right now, and don't want to look > into it since the snapshots don't have this problem. Is 19a a > requirement?
Good to know it's fixed. I'll try my luck building from sources, and if not use the snapshots. >> "Rahul Jain" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Are the characteristics of your objects isomorphic to those of complex > numbers? I.e., does the result of multiplication have a useful analog in > the 2-element vector domain? If not, you're abusing the type system. You > should abstract the interface to these pairs and implement them using > cons cells, most likely. I was thinking of using complex numbers as the machine representation for Cartesian coordinates mostly based on the (perhaps misguided) assumption that I could use phase and cis for nothing. No need to worry about my poor data and it's abstraction (I stumbled on the error in the data accessors). :) Vladimir
