On Fri, 5 Nov 2004, Zbyszek Jurkiewicz wrote:
> feasible and what is not --- and the decision depends on current > technology state (we should only define the behaviors we know we can > implement). The agreement in this case should come from language standard > group or similar body, otherwise we end up with nonportable programs. Note that I specifically asked whether continuation support would be possible in CMU CL, not whether one may extend CL in an appropriate way. First of all, I want to solve problems. Portability is a very minor concern. -- regards, [EMAIL PROTECTED] (o_ Thomas Fischbacher - http://www.cip.physik.uni-muenchen.de/~tf //\ (lambda (n) ((lambda (p q r) (p p q r)) (lambda (g x y) V_/_ (if (= x 0) y (g g (- x 1) (* x y)))) n 1)) (Debian GNU)
