On Thu, 18 Nov 2004 15:20:43 +0300, "Oleg A. Paraschenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After spending some time on CL-XML, I decided that CLOS/MOP is a > nice idea, but realizations are not compatible, and so it is better > to be away from CLOS. I hope I'm wrong. You're wrong. CLOS is a part of the Common Lisp language and thus standardized by ANSI. If you think your Lisp implementation doesn't behave as it should you should check with your vendor and ask them to fix it. <http://www.lispworks.com/reference/HyperSpec/> The MOP isn't part of the language standard but most Lisp implementations have it. If they have it they're usually trying to adhere to the "AMOP" book. Again, if you think your Lisp doesn't do what it should consult your vendor. <http://www.lisp.org/mop/index.html> Edi.
