Luke Gorrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Is there a way to make the compiler print a note that, with the > definitions in this file, foo's call to bar will always result in an > error?
Perhaps with block compilation: (declaim (ext:start-block foo)) (defun foo () (bar 1)) (defun bar (x) (symbol-value x)) (declaim (ext:end-block)) Which is arguably not that different from a module declaration. Helmut.
