On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 23:12:16 +0100, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, 26 Mar 2005 12:58:03 -0800, GP lisper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Is there a better callback example someplace? One that has >> c-subroutines calling lisp? > > <http://www.cons.org/cmucl/doc/tcl-callback.html> > > Cheers, > Edi.
(answering my own post) with: /home/fph/lisp/TCL-FFI-test: used 68 available 26539680 drwxr-xr-x 2 fph users 4096 Mar 27 02:17 . drwxr-xr-x 9 fph users 8192 Mar 27 02:17 .. -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 3251 Mar 27 02:17 Linux-os.h -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 339 Mar 27 01:45 alloc.h -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1489 Mar 27 01:45 arch.h -rw-r--r-- 1 fph users 6688 Mar 27 01:05 cl-tcl.lisp -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 17440 Mar 27 01:38 internals.h -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 1496 Mar 27 01:45 lisp.h -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 2846 Mar 27 02:02 os.h -rw-r--r-- 1 fph users 1376 Mar 27 01:06 tcl-callback.c -rw-r--r-- 1 fph users 1656 Mar 27 02:17 tcl-callback.o only one warning: tcl-callback.c: In function `Register_Tcl_Lisp_Command': tcl-callback.c:60: warning: passing arg 3 of `Tcl_CreateCommand' from incompatible pointer type Can those header files be mentioned on the cited callback webpage? -- Everyman has three hearts; one to show the world, one to show friends, and one only he knows.
