Raymond Toy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Greg> 30: (SWANK-BACKEND::SIGIO-HANDLER #<#1=unused-arg> #<#1#> #<#1#>) > > I don't think CMUCL is interrupt-safe, so using sigio-handler with > slime can cause weird failures. At least it happens once in a while > on Sparc; I think x86 is a bit better here.
I'd like to point out that a SIGIO handler is no less robust than a SIGINT handler. So, if you experience weird failures with Slime you should also experience them if you run CMUCL in a xterm and press ^C. Helmut.
