> PS. I was looking over the recent thread mentioned in parentheses in > the subject line -- I too am interested in attaching to running CMUCL > processes. I'd be curious to know whether Denis Papathanasiou was > satisfied by the lispserver info (if he's reading this).
In the end, I wound up using detachtty/attachtty for this (i.e. invoke the process under detachtty, accessing the REPL using attachtty when necessary) and it really works well. My interest is in creating a MUD-like environment with distinct users interacting with the same LISP process, so I don't think this approach would work for me.
