On Thu, Dec 19, 2002 at 02:46:33PM -0500, Martin Cracauer wrote: > So did you try the -dynamic-space-size option? > > All the other spaces in CMUCL are also drastically oversized by > default as well. I run them all at the bare minimum just fine.
Happy New Year! I managed to try it out now. Here the ktrace output for "lisp": 30948 lisp RET read 32/0x20 30948 lisp CALL close(0x3) 30948 lisp RET close 0 30948 lisp CALL sigprocmask(0x1,0x180717a0,0xbfbffb1c) 30948 lisp RET sigprocmask 0 30948 lisp CALL sigprocmask(0x3,0x180717b0,0) 30948 lisp RET sigprocmask 0 30948 lisp CALL mmap(0x10000000,0xffff000,0x7,0x1012,0xffffffff,0,0,0) 30948 lisp RET mmap 268435456/0x10000000 30948 lisp PSIG SIGSEGV SIG_DFL Here's "lisp -dynamic-space-size 10": 31065 lisp RET read 32/0x20 31065 lisp CALL close(0x3) 31065 lisp RET close 0 31065 lisp CALL sigprocmask(0x1,0x180717a0,0xbfbffafc) 31065 lisp RET sigprocmask 0 31065 lisp CALL sigprocmask(0x3,0x180717b0,0) 31065 lisp RET sigprocmask 0 31065 lisp CALL mmap(0x10000000,0xffff000,0x7,0x1012,0xffffffff,0,0,0) 31065 lisp RET mmap 268435456/0x10000000 31065 lisp PSIG SIGSEGV SIG_DFL > Are you sure you are facing resource limit issues and not mmap'ing > into space not mmap'able? I dunno, really. What does the ktrace output say? Thanks. Cheers. -- Ng Pheng Siong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> * http://www.netmemetic.com
