> Maybe, but I briefly tried paserve from cvs with openmcl and it looked, > well, non-finished.
I didn't have this impression, but then maybe CMUCL is better supported. Or it could be that I checked out the sources at a lucky moment (a few months ago). > I was hoping to be able to stay with 'released' versions. As far as I > can tell, the latest released version of paserve is 1.2.12c and of > cmucl is 18d. I thought other people might have used or at least tested > that combination. I _tried_ to use it. I had problems similar to yours. After upgrading to the cvs version things got much much better. YMMV of course. BTW the paserve mailing list at sf may be a more appropriate forum for this kind of problem. Andras
