"Paul Werkowski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > | Is this supposed to work that way? If so, why? > > I think so, can you show that current behaviour violates the ANS?
Well, no. I just have been surprised by it. > | AFAICS, I need to know the pathname-type of fasls for this to > | work. How do I get it before having set up the pathname translations? > > Set up your translations for *.FASL to be what you want. I wasn't sure whether *.FASL would always be used for logical pathnames. Turns out to make things easier at a first glance. Thanks Henrik
