Christophe Rhodes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > This was fixed by Alexey for x86 and by me for other architectures in > the sbcl-0.7.13.x development series.
Hrm, no, maybe that's not what I'm seeing. Certainly, setting SB-C::*CHECK-CONSISTENCY* to T, then evaluating the tagbody form in question, in a recent CVS sbcl gives no errors and a NIL return value, as I would expect. Evaluation consistency problems were fixed in the sbcl-0.7.13.x development series: since we deleted the EVAL stack, we don't need to have a TN around for it in the SAVE-DYNAMIC-STATE and RESTORE-DYNAMIC-STATE vops. I'd be more inclined to blame the IR1 interpreter, meself... Cheers, Christophe -- http://www-jcsu.jesus.cam.ac.uk/~csr21/ +44 1223 510 299/+44 7729 383 757 (set-pprint-dispatch 'number (lambda (s o) (declare (special b)) (format s b))) (defvar b "~&Just another Lisp hacker~%") (pprint #36rJesusCollegeCambridge)
