In AMOP, the function ENSURE-CLASS-USING-CLASS is specified to take the positional parameters CLASS and NAME and then a set of keyword parameters. In pcl/std-class.lisp however, the positional parameters are in the opposite order: NAME and CLASS. Is this difference intentional -- does the PCL of CMUCL follow a published specification other than AMOP?
- Re: parameters of ENSURE-CLASS-USING-CLASS vs. AMOP Kalle Olavi Niemitalo
- Re: parameters of ENSURE-CLASS-USING-CLASS vs. ... Gerd Moellmann
