On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 06:16, Gerd Moellmann wrote: > Craig Lanning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > If I change the line above to: > > (return (values args t))))) > > > > It works just fine. > > Argh, sorry for that :/. > > BTW, there was another bug in the code, and I've settled on the > following fix, now (and I've double-checked that it actually compiles > and works with Dietz' ANSI tests :): > > [thanks for the patch, any idea when this patch will show up in a > release?] > > On a different note: You mentioned a warning that would like to get > rid of. Could you please try to make a simple test case for that?
I didn't mean a single warning. This application generates and loads a lot of interpreted lisp code. Each time it does CMUCL compiles that code as it loads. The compiler produces a lot of warnings about the code that is being compiled. I just want to suppress those warnings so that they don't clutter the output from the application. Craig
