Could u possibly send a pic of ur #3 inside track? 
Location,length,manufac?support used for mounting? 

Thanks.  

Bill Striegel
C&C 34 #419
"Panacea"
Ocean Springs, MS

Sent from my iPad

On Aug 9, 2012, at 12:54 AM, OldSteveH <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks for feedback. I was quoting true wind so add 5 knots.
> We didn't lose the 1/2 knot of speed when reefing, only once we doused the 
> main.
> I too have inboard tracks for the #3, they work well.
> 
> John, the 34's main is not all that big to start with, I have considered 
> having a second reef point put in but didn't think it was worth the bother.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> Steve Hood
> S/V Diamond Girl
> C&C 34
> Lions Head ON
> 
> 
> ------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> On Aug 7, 2012, at 8:32 PM, "John and Maryann Read" <[email protected]> 
> wrote:
>>> Sounds about right and what we experience.  For racing, we use a full hoist
>>> #3 with battens that not quite overlaps the shrouds and uses an inboard
>>> track I mounted on the cabin top.  Starts to be really effective at 25
>>> apparent.  We have 2 reefs in the main, and if all that is too much it is
>>> time for the storm sail.  Key is keep up boat speed and VMG.  The more on
>>> her feet, the better the VMG
>>> 
>>> John and Maryann
>>> Legacy III
>>> 1982 C&C 34
>>> Noank, CT
>>> 
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
>>> On Behalf Of dwight veinot
>>> Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 12:52 PM
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Re: Stus-List C&C 34 Sail Selection
>>> 
>>> Sounds about right...the only important winds when under sail are apparent
>>> winds so I assume you are giving apparent wind strengths...surprised you
>>> lost 1/2 kt boat speed when you reefed, I would have expected less or no
>>> speed loss and less heel with more control in puffs...I also had a 24 and a
>>> 27III, before I got my present boat the 35 MKII which is a bit stiffer that
>>> either the 24 or the 27 MKIII but IMHO it could do with about 500 pounds
>>> more ballast low despite that it already has nearly 6000 pounds of lead in
>>> the keel
>>> 
>>> Dwight Veinot
>>> C&C 35 MKII, Alianna
>>> Head of St. Margaret's Bay, NS
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
>>> On Behalf Of OldSteveH
>>> Sent: August 7, 2012 1:32 PM
>>> To: [email protected]
>>> Subject: Stus-List C&C 34 Sail Selection
>>> 
>>> 
>>> Now in my 3rd summer with this boat I am getting better at choosing sails
>>> for the wind conditions, and would like to know how it compares with others
>>> experiences.
>>> 
>>> From I have heard the 34 is a 'Lake Ontario' boat, designed for light air
>>> conditions, but able to handle other conditions as one would expect.
>>> 
>>> Yesterday my crew and I were quite comfortable in steady 22-25 knot winds
>>> carrying the 3 and a full main on a beat, eventually putting in a reef. Heel
>>> angle was 20ish. When gusts to 27-29 started we were getting over to 30
>>> degrees at times and I had to feather even the reefed main to keep the boat
>>> on its feet. We kept hull speed the whole time.
>>> 
>>> Per other posts baby stay tension was moderate, backstay had 2500 psi on
>>> adjuster, mast pumping was minimal, weather helm one wedge of my wheel.
>>> 
>>> Once we got steadily overpowered I dropped the main and sailed under #3
>>> only, with much better heel angle. But we lost 1/2 a knot to about 6.2-6.3.
>>> Mast pumped a bit more but I only have 2:1 purchase on the baby stay so
>>> couldn't do much about it.
>>> 
>>> My background comes from a C&C24 and a 27 MkIII, also tender boats so all
>>> here seems about right. How does it compare with others?
>>> 
>>> Thanks,
>>> 
>>> Steve Hood
>>> S/V Diamond Girl
>>> C&C 34
>>> Lions Head ON
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
> http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
> [email protected]

_______________________________________________
This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
[email protected]

Reply via email to