When will you stop blaiming Bush for everything? Like I said Carter's failed
policys are what caused the ragheads to attack our embassy's and bomb New York.
Bushs didn't cause it but they both fought back against there evil doings. WALK
SOFTLY AND CARRY A BIG STICK. That is the only thing that keeps our many
enimeys away from us.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone
-------- Original message --------
From: jeff Gove <[email protected]>
Date:05/05/2014 4:06 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: Jack McCall <[email protected]>
Subject: RE: SIFTING TRUTH FROM POLITICAL FICTION, by Jack Alexanders
Just remember when Carter was President, we were never at War. Peace brother
Peace! Bush did not keep us safe either, 9-11 on his watch.
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: SIFTING TRUTH FROM POLITICAL FICTION, by Jack Alexanders
Date: Mon, 5 May 2014 14:54:48 -0400
Hey stupid, that's because Bush sent the Marines, Army, Navy etc to get the
bastards that attacked us. Our cowardly president calls them bad names
sometimes and then does nothing. He and the bitch Hillary made a POLITICAL
decision to cover up the fact that the rag-heads attacked us again on Sept.
11th and it had nothing to do with a stupid video. The Lied, Lied and then
Lied again just to make themselves look good and get reelected. I don't think
we should start another war but I do think we should get the bastards that
murdered our people and put them to death. If like Carter we act like wimps
and cowards we only open the door for them to attack us again here in America.
From: jeff Gove [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Monday, May 05, 2014 10:44 AM
To: Jack McCall
Subject: RE: SIFTING TRUTH FROM POLITICAL FICTION, by Jack Alexanders
Just remember that during W. Bush's term's in office we had 11 attacks on our
Embassies' with something like 80 people killed, where was the outcry then?
There was none, no Democratic committee's or witch hunting going on. This is a
total sham by the right wing nuts.
Date: Sun, 4 May 2014 15:38:08 -0400
Subject: RE: SIFTING TRUTH FROM POLITICAL FICTION, by Jack Alexanders
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
You wouldn't see the truth if it smacked you in the face. How much more of this
shit can we take? Six years going backwards
We are mad as hell and won't take the lies any more.
Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone
-------- Original message --------
From: jeff Gove
Date:05/04/2014 11:14 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: Jack McCall
Subject: RE: SIFTING TRUTH FROM POLITICAL FICTION, by Jack Alexanders
No, the repubs are just looking for a scandal so they have somethhing else to
do instead of helping move the Country forward by governing.
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected];
[email protected]
Subject: FW: SIFTING TRUTH FROM POLITICAL FICTION, by Jack Alexanders
Date: Sat, 3 May 2014 16:14:38 -0400
SIFTING TRUTH FROM POLITICAL FICTION
Is Benghazi Obama’s Watergate?
By Jack Alexander 5/1/14
Benghazi remains front and center in the news. No less than Charles
Krauthammer conflates the Benghazi story to Nixon’s Watergate. Centrist Liberal
reporter Mara Liasson predicts it will continue to have “legs” (a journalistic
label for a story with continuing life).
Thursday it became fascinating again – in the sense that watching a pride of
lions pursue and devour a gazelle is fascinating – to witness live, on C-Span,
the obvious embarrassment of a 33-year career U.S. military officer, one
responsible for multiple U.S. involvements throughout the African continent.
Brigadier General Robert Lowell told the House Oversight Committee the proud
task of the US military is, “Always go towards the guns.” Representative Jason
Chaffetz (R-UT) asked, “Why didn’t our military immediately go towards the
guns? Had they done so, could they have saved our people in Benghazi?”
The General responded, “We may have been able to. We’ll never know. But we
should have tried.” Lowell’s emotion and damaged pride was obvious, nonetheless
he firmly challenged the WH version of the Benghazi tragedy.
“We knew almost right away it was an organized, coordinated terrorist
attack. This was not a demonstration gone terribly awry,” Lowell stated,
firmly. He added that U.S. authorities – the State Department, the Intelligence
community, the Military and the White House – all knew it almost immediately.
Lowell thus refuted the Obama administration’s immediate fairy-tale to the
public that the episode was merely “a spontaneous demonstration in response to
an objectionable video,” a fable the WH arrogantly stuck with for two weeks.
Further pressed, Gen. Lowell inferred that launching a military rescue
mission to defend our Benghazi consulate – and potentially to save the four
Americans murdered there, including Ambassador Stevens – required an order from
the State Department. State officials and top military brass “were in dialogue”
within six hours of the start of the assault, he said. “No order came to help.”
Subsequent to the attack, the Administration, and countless Democrats
defending WH obfuscation on the issue, claimed, “They couldn’t have got there
in time.” This conveniently attempted to deflect what quickly had become known:
That it WAS a terrorist attack, and Americans were under significant armed
assault. Not knowing how long the assault would last, an immediate rescue
should have been mounted, hopeless or not. We don’t leave our dead and wounded
alone on the battlefield.
As I watched the scenario unfold Thursday on C-Span, several things became
evident. First, it was political theater at its most disgusting. It was easy to
tell the stripes of each committee member; questions by the Republicans, though
somewhat disjointed, focused on the attack and its immediate fallout into
politicized defense of a President facing re-election two months hence -- one
who had publicly declared Al Queda “on the run, their leadership decimated.”
The committee Democrats, as is their wont, speechified, filibustered, and
asked questions either innocuous or off-point, as they tried to shut down the
issue as an issue -- “covering up the cover up,” as Krauthammer expressed it.
It became worse at the White House’s Thursday press conference, telecast on
Fox News after the congressional hearing. To see Press Secretary Jay Carney
bobbing-and-weaving,” desperately trying to fend off aggressive questions from
a W.H. press corps finally aroused on an issue they had laughed off for 18
months, was political theater in all its awful morbidity.
Among major news media, Fox News alone has given the Benghazi story legs,
and was mocked for doing so by their MSM peers, who must be professionally
embarrassed to be viewed today as “a propaganda arm of the Obama
administration.”
It was almost comical, but actually cringingly painful, to watch Carney
squirm. “They don’t pay Carney enough,” said Krauthammer. In a word, Carney was
pathetic. One might sympathize with anyone paid to defend an obtuse and seldom
credible administration from the consequences of its years of arrogance, while
trying to maintain one’s own pride.
But Carney himself was arrogance personified. The President’s Press
Secretary talked down to the WH press corps, resorted to GOP bashing (and Fox
bashing). He flailed at “Republican conspiracy theories,” and he lied about
“not one smidgen of evidence” (to quote Obama) of Administration obfuscation on
the Benghazi issue.
With straight face and condescending tone Carney claimed, “We have submitted
twenty-five thousand documents, worked with five investigating committees, and
nothing has been proven” about lying by Administration officials regarding
Benghazi.
That Carney was b… s….ing was plain to anyone who has followed the issue of
WH stonewalling it. That submitted un-classified documents were redacted, many
virtually unreadable, goes without saying in this Obama political environment,
in which proving anything is difficult as this Administration conceals
politically sensitive items behind the curtains.
Still, journalists persisted Thursday with thorny questions (including CBS,
NBC, ABC, Fox and CNN) to Carney’s obvious chagrin. What stimulated their
interest was a significant document, requested by Congress fourteen months ago,
that surfaced just this week at the civilian organization Judicial Watch,
following legal action. The document put in question the origination of the
Benghazi “talking points memo.” Was it CIA or WH? Carney claimed it was CIA.
Facts suggest otherwise, with WH staff in the spotlight.
This document – a report by WH staffer Ben Rose -- kept the Benghazi “legs”
kicking. Undoubtedly the legs will kick on as calls come for a bi-partisan,
bi-cameral Select Committee to investigate the matter. Senators McCain and Paul
have already spoken to this. House Speaker Boehner seems ready to act.
Congressional committees have been consistently stonewalled by this
Administration – unconstitutionally some claim – since its outset, and not only
on Benghazi but on IRS and Fast & Furious, to cite just two other issues. The
blithering Madam Pelosi bleats, “Subterfuge! Benghazi, Benghazi, Benghazi. Why
won’t they stop asking about Benghazi?” She’d better start worrying what else
“they” might start to ask about.
There are reasonable liberal voices on TV these days. Many finally are
expressing concern about the Obama Administration’s lack of truth, promised
transparency, and obvious loss of credibility. Kirsten Powers, Juan Williams,
Doug Schoen and Joe Trippi are my favorites, along with Mara Liasson. (The
voluble Bob Beckel and the sometimes obnoxious James Carville are at least
amusing as they loudly flail at views beyond their own.)
All the above appear frequently on Fox News. To that extent they balance
their more strident liberal peers on NBC, CBS, ABC, CNN and NPR. On Fox News
Special Report last night Liasson said: “You can almost see the picture of the
White House spinning.” That’s certainly true, but it was refreshingly out of
character for Liasson.
There’s no question a biased MSN, even if awakening to Obama’s perfidy,
still must be embarrassed for being ”stoned, spun and rolled for eighteen
months” by the White House on Benghazi, Krauthammer suggests, with some
validity. A media so wrapped in ideology (whether left or right) that it cannot
inform the people with professional objectivity is clear danger to democratic
society rather than a positive attribute.
We only hope Americans en masse become more aware of today’s political
reality, despite a dissembling White House and an Obama-sycophantic media, as
Obama’s “fundamentally changing” America stumbles towards its moments of truth
on Nov. 2014 and Nov. 2016.
5/1/14
***
JPA
Embassieskille
_______________________________________________
This List is provided by the C&C Photo Album
http://www.cncphotoalbum.com
[email protected]
