The stability graph has three C&C 25s listed. A 25, a mk1 and a mk2 When was the 25 built (as opposed to the mk 1) ? Bettina
> Am Jun 14, 2016 um 15:15 schrieb Martin Kane via CnC-List > <[email protected]>: > > That stability graph definitely shows the 29-2 as tender. > However I could wash the windows on the 25-2 if I had a mind to. I also owned > a 33-1 which, when we were racing, would have the person responsible for > helping the genoa around when tacking, ankle deep in water if the wind was up > and they were slow in getting off the low side. I don’t see the 33-1 on the > chart. > I’m reluctant to argue with a proven methodology, but I find the 29-2 to be > both stiff and forgiving compared to the other 2. To me the 29-2 heels to a > certain point where the rail is still not buried and then says you really > should do something with the main and if you don’t it will start to round up > rather than continue to heel. Is it possible that this behaviour is due to > the hull shape and this is not captured in the stability test which is > static. If so that could explain why the boat is rated as tender, but will > only heel to a certain point in real world conditions. > > Martin > C&C 29-2 > Recaluating > > From: randy [mailto:[email protected]] > Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 3:56 PM > To: [email protected] > Cc: 'Martin Kane' <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Stus-List C and C 25 water in lockers under settees > > H Martin, suggest you check out the stability diagram: > http://www.cncphotoalbum.com/technical/stability.htm > > > randy > Tamanawas > 29-II > Hood River, OR > > > > From: CnC-List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Martin > Kane via CnC-List > Sent: Tuesday, June 14, 2016 9:58 AM > To: [email protected] > Cc: Martin Kane <[email protected]> > Subject: Stus-List C and C 25 water in lockers under settees > > I experienced this occasionally when I had a C&C 25-2. It would only happen > when the sailing hard to weather with the rail buried. If I were going to > tighten the hull/deck joint screws I’d start with those closest to the > chainplates. > > This is not an issue with the 29-2 as it is a very stiff boat and doesn’t > appear possible to bury the rail. > > Martin > C&C 29-2 Recalculating > > > _______________________________________________ > > This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you like > what we do, please help us pay for our costs by donating. All Contributions > are greatly appreciated!
_______________________________________________ This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you like what we do, please help us pay for our costs by donating. All Contributions are greatly appreciated!
