Yup.
During the earlier part of hurricane Charlie trying to escape upwind, we had a 
triple reef in the main and the #3 up. The boat balanced pretty well that way.
Joe
Coquina

From: CnC-List [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Ronald B. 
Frerker via CnC-List
Sent: Tuesday, May 2, 2017 12:24 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Ronald B. Frerker <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Stus-List Sail advice for 35

I remember sailing a 35-2 in heavy air with jib and main and had to have more 
than 6deg of rudder angle to keep it going.  Seemed like we needed to take a 
tuck in the main and use a larger jib for better balance.
The old rule was "keep the power up front."
Ron
Wild Cheri
C&C 30-1
STL


________________________________
From: "Della Barba, Joe via CnC-List" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
To: "[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>" 
<[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Cc: "Della Barba, Joe" <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>>
Sent: Tuesday, May 2, 2017 10:49 AM
Subject: Re: Stus-List Sail advice for 35

The MK I C&C 35 at least is going no place with a working jib in light air - 
the boat is very headsail dependent. So much so we never used the first reef in 
the main offshore - if you need to reef at all, you need the 2nd or 3rd ;)
I wish the jib was enough, I could just use that and save some cash. So given 
that, I can't see going as small as 100, no matter how easy it is to handle. So 
far I am thinking maybe 125? I used to have a 145 mylar laminate furling jib 
with a foam luff. When it was good, it was very good. When the sail started to 
delaminate and get mold in the middle of it......not so much.
Joe
Coquina
_______________________________________________

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you wish to 
make a contribution to offset our costs, please go to:  
https://www.paypal.me/stumurray

All Contributions are greatly appreciated!

Reply via email to