Hi Bruno/Dave

Yes #1, #2, #3 is not really meaningful to the sailmaker for design 
consideration but is very important for crew.  The 33-2 is quite similar to our 
Frers 33.  On the Frers 33 the conventional wisdom is 150, 140, blade.  
Persistence came with a nearly new #3 (smallish and capable of rolling), an old 
but serviceable 150 (UK Tape Drive) and a couple older furling and non furling 
150.  Accordingly our first sail purchase after discussions with other owners 
and sailmaker was a North heavy #1 (140% of LP).  This is a mylar/pentex 
paneled sail.  In winds 13-18 TWS this sail is fantastic.  The 150 is too much 
sail in anything over 15 TWS and even when fully crewed we are overpowered when 
we have this up on those times when it sneaks up over 15 knots.  Our second 
sail purchase was this year to replace our old UK Tape Drive 150.  We went with 
a Doyle 155.  I recall the sail cloth was called something like PXb which is I 
think tecnora and mylar and is also paneled.  This sail will be very nice in 
the lighter winds but is much more powerful than the UK 150 so we will be using 
this as a light #1 and the North 140 as a heavy #1.  Winds 15-20 knots TWS 
sustained and above we use our blade.  I have marked the bags as #1 for the 
155, #2 for the 140 and we call the blade #3.  This is only to lessen the 
chance of the wrong headsail being brought on deck

When cruising we put the #3 (Quantum pentex with taffeta both sides) on the 
furler and sail a bit underpowered

The #3 can be seen in this photo http://users.eastlink.ca/~mhoyt/DSC_1859-2.jpg
The Heavy #1 (North 140) can be seen here 
http://users.eastlink.ca/~mhoyt/CanadaDayRace.jpg
Over powered with the UK Tape Drive 150 here 
http://users.eastlink.ca/~mhoyt/close_hauled.jpg

As stated earlier.  The 33-2 is a very similar boat.  I race on one 
occasionally but not yet enough to know the ideal sail configuration but feel 
it may be similar to the Frers 33

First Wednesday race of the season this evening.

Mike
Persistence
1987 Frers 33 #16
Halifax
http://users.eastlink.ca/~mhoyt




From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of Bruno 
Lachance via CnC-List
Sent: Tuesday, May 02, 2017 11:50 PM
To: cnc-list@cnc-list.com
Cc: Bruno Lachance; syerd...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Stus-List Sail advice for 35

Dave,

I suggest you get your sails measured by your local sailmaker. He will be glad 
to do it if you bring them for a preseason inspection.

My sailmaker does not like to talk in term of no1-2-3 or %, he prefers to use 
the sail area measurements in square meters. This way you can really compare 
the horsepower of your sailplan and see what is missing to match the different 
wind conditions. This is really interesting in the design process of a new sail.

Becassine wardrobe was composed of a triradial cruising laminate "large" no. 3 
that equals 110% ( ok I admit I don't remember the m2...) the PO also had a 
light Mylar decksweeper no1 150%.

Like you I wanted to have a no2 and asked for a 135%. My sailmaker suggested a 
sail area that would just cleared in front of the top spreaders going close 
upwind. His model showed that this would perform better than a slightly larger 
135, as I would not be able to sheet it in as much clausehauled. The result was 
about 132%. I climbed the rig to double check every measurements to be sure he 
had the right ones. I have the Offshore spar mast on my boat

This sail is really nice, but honestly I don't use it as much as I thought I 
would. When racing I often choose to go big with the tired 150% or with the 110 
when it really blows. It seems I don't have much of the in between in my area. 
But when I do, I am first at the weather mark!

You are right that the 33-2 is really responsive to sail trim. Very rewarding 
little boat.

Bruno lachance
Becassine, 1987 33-2
New Richmond, Qc

Envoyé de mon iPad

Le 2 mai 2017 à 21:10, Syerdave--- via CnC-List 
<cnc-list@cnc-list.com<mailto:cnc-list@cnc-list.com>> a écrit :
An interesting discussion, and agreed on that.   I don't like sailing under 
headsail alone, but would rather balance the sailplan, play the main sheet in 
the puffs and tweak the Main's twist and shape with the baby stay, outhaul, 
traveller.  vs many boats I've sailed the 33-2 is so responsive you can feel 
the impact of minor changes.   Really looking forward to flying my new main 
this season.   Keeping the helm light (balance) and the boat on its its feet 
(not overpowered) works best for me.
First I reef, then I furl, but I really hate the Furler  as a sail reduction 
device.   According to the sailbags, I have a #1 and #3.   There have been 
times I wished I had one in between, and it would probably be useful.   Don't 
know how these equate in terms of % of foretriangle.   Anyone know this for a 
33-2?
Several listers referred me to the "maximum sailpower" blog awhile back, and 
that was an eyeopener into many finer points of sail trim and design that I did 
not fully appreciate.
Looking forward to some warmer weather here....

Dave 33-2 Windstar
Toronto area.

All Contributions are greatly appreciated!
_______________________________________________

This list is supported by the generous donations of our members. If you wish to 
make a contribution to offset our costs, please go to:  
https://www.paypal.me/stumurray

All Contributions are greatly appreciated!

Reply via email to