Agreed value is for the entire boat. I am not sure that helps with dismasting
or other non-total loses.
Joe Della Barba
From: CnC-List [mailto:cnc-list-boun...@cnc-list.com] On Behalf Of Marek
Dziedzic via CnC-List
Sent: Friday, February 09, 2018 12:09 PM
Cc: Marek Dziedzic
Subject: Re: Stus-List Restarting Thread - Insurance
Isn’t one of the options the so called “agreed value” insurance? This is what I
am using for over 10 years (both for the previous boat and this one). This way,
the value does not depreciate over time. You agree on the value (in fact you
call it, but they adjust the premium) and that’s it. Any additional costs
(liability, salvage etc.) don’t depreciate, so it is not the issue.
just my 2 (Canadian) cents
in Ottawa, ON
From: John Christopher via CnC-List
Sent: Friday, February 9, 2018 11:57
To: Joel Aronson
Cc: John Christopher ; firstname.lastname@example.org<mailto:email@example.com>
Subject: Re: Stus-List Restarting Thread - Insurance: SHAME on Boat U.S./Geico!
Have been monitoring this thread from the Canadian north.
A pattern to consider in relation to depreciation is, considering the
hurricanes, storms, frequency, numbers, and perhaps where people store their
boats for the winter (mainland or other).
It comes to mind the insurers are also mitigating their risk for the future.
As a result they have devised a method that supports paying out far less than
they do today due to the increased frequency of disasters.
I don’t mean to stir the pot here, just an observation.
Thanks everyone for supporting this list with your contributions. Each and
every one is greatly appreciated. If you want to support the list - use PayPal
to send contribution -- https://www.paypal.me/stumurray