Thanks, Alan. I appreciate the good advice. I don't expect to get what I
put into her. I just want to be thoughtful on how I insure her. 👍

On Sun, Jun 26, 2022, 6:10 PM ALAN BERGEN via CnC-List <
cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:

> See what other boats like yours are selling for on Yachtworld.com to give
> you a better idea of what to insure her for. Also get a quote from
> Progressive. I had insurance through BoatUS for decades, but a quote from
> Progressive was less than half of what GEICO wanted. Don't skimp on
> liability insurance. That will cover you if youy damage someone else's
> property, and it's cheaper hthat hull insurance. Things like spars and
> sails are depreciated, unless the boat is totaled. $70k does sound high to
> me. Don't expect to get back what you put into her.
>
> Alan Bergen
> 35 Mk III Thirsty
> Rose City YC
> Portland, OR
>
>
>
> On Sun, Jun 26, 2022 at 2:55 PM Brian Davis via CnC-List <
> cnc-list@cnc-list.com> wrote:
>
>> I have an insurance question for my fellow C&C'ers. My wife and I bought
>> Nina (1980 Landfall 38) 6 years ago for $25k. I've had Geico Marine ever
>> since for an insured value of $30k with a vanishing deductible that is now
>> zero. I have since restored her to about 95% and tracked all my receipts in
>> a spreadsheet totalling $45k. We are very happy with the result and the
>> only remaining 2 projects are a dodger/bimini and replacing the side plexi
>> windows.
>>
>> I inquired with Geico Marine about increasing the coverage from $30k to
>> $70k. I would first need to pay for a surveyor to inspect and write a
>> report (I don't know how much this is). Then my rate would go from $1,759
>> to $2,372 per year.
>>
>> I know this is a sliding scale based on the condition of each boat, and
>> I'm cool with the money I've put into her so far since we love her. Nearly
>> all of it is parts cost only because I am a skilled craftsman. Is $70k to
>> much insurance, and is $2,372 to much to pay for it?
>>
>> Would appreciate any thoughts and advice.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Brian
>>
>

Reply via email to