FWIW, I believe the conduit size in our mast is 1" ID.  I pulled all new 16gage 
wires in when I replaced the lights with LED style.
Windex (2 wires)
Tricolor (2 wires)
Steaming/deck light combo (3 wires)
VHF cable
Removed the wind instrument cable because I have TickTick wireless.  Pulled in 
a better VHF cable, which turned out thinner than the 1989 one.  There is room 
for another cable for TV or WiFi booster or FLIR or something, but I prefer to 
keep the rig light.     

Marinebeam.com has some reasonably priced fixtures.  I got their two wire 
masttop Tricolor/anchor/strobe light.  
https://store.marinebeam.com/smart-led-tri-color-anchor-light-and-strobe/

My only regret is I didn't pull in a pull string for future.  

Chuck Scheaffer Resolute 1989 C&C 34R



> On 08/19/2022 8:32 AM Leeward Rail via CnC-List <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>  
> Vhf coax LMR400UF
> Cell booster antenna with coax of some unknown size... Likely some other 
> large low loss cable like LMR400
> Steaming light
> Anchor light
> Decklight.
> 
> One day may have wind instruments
> 
> Bigger is easier when fishing wire.
> 
> Why undersize it when it costs virtually the same and takes the same effort?
> 
> 
> Aug. 19, 2022 7:14:47 a.m. Jeff Nelson via CnC-List <[email protected]>:
> 
> > I do not believe there are any obstructions.  That said 1.5 inches seems 
> > pretty big for 5 - 7 wires...
> > what all you got going on up there?
> > 
> > -- 
> > Cheers,
> >    Jeff Nelson
> >    Muir Caileag
> >    C&C 30 - 549
> >    Armdale Y.C.
> > 
> > On 2022-08-18 14:17, leewardrail hotmail via CnC-List wrote:
> >> Hello All,
> >> 
> >> I am planning to install conduit in the mast of our 30 Mark 1.
> >> 
> >> Unfortunately I am hours away from the boat, and need to buy the conduit
> >> 
> >> Would 1.5" PVC Conduit fit ?  Would 1.5" run without obstruction all the 
> >> way to the masthead, or is there something at the spreader that would get 
> >> in the way ?
> >> 
> >> I prefer 1 1/2"   1 1/4" is about the minimum I would want to use.
> >> 
> >> Thanks !

Reply via email to