On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 5:38 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. <[email protected]> wrote: > On 4/16/2010 9:59 AM, Garrett Serack wrote: >> For Library packages (static and dynamic) I’m wondering if we shouldn’t >> just put both variants in the same package—still installing the WinSxS >> binaries appropriately, and putting the .lib files in the correct spot. >> >> This would actually conserve disk-space, since the x64 and x86 versions >> of the packages could share include & doc directories, and we could use >> symlinks for that. > > Don't go there. > > This is the source of most OS/X pain; the fact that Apple has stacked the > single unified binaries. Many open source include files simply don't and > can't cope with this, and many patches that would enable this on OS/X are > rejected out of hand because the model is broken with respect to particular > open source projects :)
Putting both variants in one package doesn't mean both variants should use the same include files, does it? Olaf _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
