Well, you can do that too. Which would be perfectly fine. I fully support that type of scenario, and the developer tools will help make that a lot easier.
Garrett Serack | Open Source Software Developer | Microsoft Corporation I don't make the software you use; I make the software you use better on Windows. -----Original Message----- From: Olaf van der Spek [mailto:olafvds...@gmail.com] Sent: Wednesday, April 21, 2010 1:55 PM To: Garrett Serack Cc: Gerald Combs; coapp-developers@lists.launchpad.net Subject: Re: [Coapp-developers] Portable application deployment On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 10:45 PM, Garrett Serack <garre...@microsoft.com> wrote: > Not really. Well--maybe--but not in the way you think, and likely this won't > happen for a bit. > > Portable applications rely on a total lack of shared libraries; rather the > complete autonomous packaging of everything needed to accomplish a particular > task, and without installing anything. What stops one from just linking everything statically? Olaf _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers Post to : coapp-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
