On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Pierre Joye <[email protected]> wrote: > hi, > > On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 9:45 PM, William A. Rowe Jr. <[email protected]> wrote: > >> CoApp seeks to be one very specific way to do it. If it happens to work for >> the >> upstream project, wonderful :) If not, it's open source, and when it's >> broke we >> get to glue both pieces together. > > That's what I would like to avoid as much as I can. At least for two things: > > - naming convention (static vs dynamic .lib for example) > - standard binary packages > > If it fails for these two, then right, CoApp will be just another > project that brings nothing to upstream developers. And I really hope > that won't be the case :) > > Except indeed if the CoApp goal is to be a distribution-like system. > But then I would not have much interest to participate.
Why not? _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
