Hmmm.. Reverse dependencies could be a computationally expensive operation :D ... Well, once there are thousands of packages.
Is there a really useful case for that? Really? Version is taken care of in the package canonicalization I specified: [repo:]name[-MM.NN][.RR][.BB] I have to do some proof-of-concept work before I get to per-user/portable/cloud install (I suspect they may be very similar to each other.) -----Original Message----- From: coapp-developers-bounces+garretts=microsoft....@lists.launchpad.net [mailto:coapp-developers-bounces+garretts=microsoft....@lists.launchpad.net] On Behalf Of Olaf van der Spek Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 5:42 PM To: Mark Stone Cc: coapp-developers@lists.launchpad.net Subject: Re: [Coapp-developers] cli command syntax On Mon, Jun 28, 2010 at 6:32 PM, Mark Stone <mark.st...@gmail.com> wrote: > You are going to want something like: > coapp --dep <package> lists the other packages on which the named > package is dependent. And --rdep to list reverse dependencies. A way to specify what version you want to install. A way to specify what install type you want (all-users, per-user, portable, source). Olaf _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers Post to : coapp-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers Post to : coapp-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~coapp-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
