Why does Qpopper with PAM support use, on average, 10 times the CPU that Qpopper without PAM support does? I've tested this one quite extensively and I'm sure that the PAM support is causing the problem but I can't think of any reason why QPOP+PAM would have such a large hit on the CPU. -- Frostie Sprout Vice President - Technology wyoming.com LLC (307) 856-6400 _______________________________________________ cobalt-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-developers
