Chris,
        Thanks for the info. My only interest in e100 is that it supports IANS. I 
have nothing against eepro100, and after your effort, I wish I could use it.

When I was using e100 on a seperate machine with three nic cards, it 
worked fine even under large loads. But I was not testing the load 
capacity or fault tolerence.

So it may be worth your time to look into e100. Maybe there will be a 
way to integrate e100 and IANS into the Cobalt os? Then on intitial 
startup/configuration a question could be asked do you want to use the 
machine as a gateway/router or combine both nics for maximum bandwidth?

Just a thought. Otherwise thanks for all the information, and I will 
post my experiences good or bad. They should be good, except for the IP 
alias thing, it may cause some problems as stated in a previous email.

Thanks again.


Chris Johnson wrote:

>     From     : Tim Hockin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>     > "William L. Thomson Jr." wrote:
>     > 
>     > >         So I would ask in return, any reason why Sun/Cobalt
>     > > decided to go with eepro100 instead of e100?
>     > 
>     > General consensus amongst kernel mailing list is that e100 sucks.
>     > Further, when we started hacking on eepro100.c, e100 was not
>     > available, I believe. 
> 
> As Tim says, e100 didn't exist at the outset of the Cobalt RaQ3
> effort, so our choices were limited.  At a later date, I put in
> an effort to stabilize the RaQ3 and RaQ4 line under extreme load
> on 4 eepro interfaces.
> 
> I evaluated the e100 (e1000-1.1.1) at that time, and it failed
> catastrophically under load on a single interface, whereas the
> eepro100 needed three interfaces to get indigestion.  It was an
> easy decision to move forward on the eepro100.c
> 
> At this stage, I can't make any claims about the e100, since I
> would guess that it has evolved from V1.1.1.  I do know that our
> eepro100 is decent.
> 
> cj*
> 
> _______________________________________________
> cobalt-developers mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-developers
> 
> 
> 



-- 
Sincerely,
William L. Thomson Jr.
Obsidian-Studios, Inc.
439 Amber Way
Petaluma, Ca. 94952
Phone   707.766.9509
Fax 
707.766.8989
http://www.obsidian-studios.com

_______________________________________________
cobalt-developers mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-developers

Reply via email to