Anders Bj�rklund wrote: > Anyone knows exactly *what* kinds of problems exist with CMU on the 550?
Jeff Bilicki wrote (perhaps here?) that he couldn't get it working, so he disabled it. > So far, what I've seen is that cmuExport exports *some kind* of xml > while cmuImport refuses to read it due to the code exiting with a > "We currently do not support RaQ550 to RaQ550 migrations" switch. That's what he put into the code because (he said) he didn't have the time to sufficiently debug it. > So in effect, the CMU on the 550 is write-only (kinda useless)... Well cmuExport is rather worthless, cmuImport seems to work fine from RaQ4. > I tried disabling those lines, and it seemed to work OK - local > on the test machine? Restoring a site that was deleted, that is. > (a very specialized form of a 550->500 migration, but ok for backup) > Have yet to try moving to another machine or other RaQ platform. > Or try any more complex migrations, for that matter. I'd say ask Jeff; he wrote it, he decided it didn't work sufficiently well enough to release. > This was using the CMU 2.43 beta from Jeff's personal site, > as Sun seems uninterested in providing a CMU for the RaQ 550 ? Sad. But apparrently true. > PS. Anyone know the license status of this code ? (the CMU) > The RPM file says "GPL", and the source just says "copyright" > Assuming it's the Sun Binary Code License, or somesuch. If the RPM file says GPL then I'd say it's GPL. Whereas I'm not a lawyer, if Jeff wrote GPL when he created the RPM, then it is. Jeff -- Jeff Lasman, nobaloney.net, P. O. Box 52672, Riverside, CA 92517 US Internet & Unix/Linux/Sun/Cobalt Consulting +1 909 778-9980 Our jblists address used on lists is for list email only To contact us offlist: "http://www.nobaloney.net/contactus.html"; _______________________________________________ cobalt-developers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-developers
