At 10:16 AM 7/26/2001, you wrote:
>I haven't loaded these patches yet, I will be doing so today. I have a
>RaQ3. It is my understanding that Cobalt went against their "VERY strong
>point" this time and reversed the patches. I believe 10260.pkg should be
>loaded before 9925.pkg. If someone could confirm this for us it would be
>greatly appreciated. Also, I know someone answered this question already,
>however, I am in the middle of a serious senior moment....do either of these
>patches require a reboot?
>
>Thanks in advance for your assistance.
>
>Karen Chamberlin
>Manager of Information Systems
>Princeton Nurseries
>Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I wrote Sun/Cobalt and they have changed the order of the
patches. No. 9925 is loaded then 9972 and then 10260. On my Raq 4 I did
not have to reboot after any of them and they say on the RaQ 4 update page
no as to rebooting on each. When they were originally posted 9972 was
listed before 9925, but 9925 was a prerequisite for 9972. (9972 was
actually released before 9925 was ready and then pulled because 9925 wasn't
ready)
_______________________________________________
cobalt-security mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-security
