> So I wonder what's worse: having the unwashed masses storming your > unsecured proFTPd port, or the chance of having one foul apple with > shell access in the basket.
It obviously depends on particular case: if you have *already* given shell access to your users for some other reason than the answer is obvious. If not, it depends. > In the end it is a matter of personal preference, as there are very few > other alternatives available. Unless you opt for one of the various > Secure-FTP or Safe(F)TP daemons available. I guess I sould mention this option. Can you give me URLs? -- Eugene _______________________________________________ cobalt-security mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-security
