I agree with Tom and all the other Cobalt owners. Give us the upgrade! This 
is just crazy to wait this long. We need Sun to take this more serious.


>From: Tom Worley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Subject: Re: [cobalt-security] Fw: [SECURITY] Remote exploit for 32-bit 
>Apache HTTP Server known
>Date: Fri, 21 Jun 2002 22:46:39 +0100
>
>On Saturday 22 June 2002 12:40 am, Paul Wilson wrote:
> > This says it is for Apache on Windows, not on Redhat or Cobalt servers.  
>My
> > understanding is that we don't have this problem here.  Am I right or
> > wrong?
>
>The code in the link on this page suggests otherwise:
>
>http://online.securityfocus.com/archive/1/277830/2002-06-17/2002-06-23/0
>
>Come on Sun/Cobalt!! Get your act together!
>UK2 told me they talked to someone from sun/cobalt who didn't even know 
>about
>the apache exploit. I forwarded my post I sent a while back to Tim Hockin
>(the guy who does the raq kernels) and he said he's passed it on to the
>security guys, so *they* must know about it now, but nobody has heard
>anything offical from cobalt about it at all!
>There are lots of people on my mailing list who are manually upgrading 
>their
>RaQ3s to 1.3.26, successfully I might add, but I think an offical update is
>seriously needed.
>
>--
>Regards,
>Tom Worley,              Worley Web Solutions
>RaQ Maintenance          http://worleyweb.net
>RaQ server help:            http://uk2raq.com
>RaQ backup:      http://uk2raq.com/backup.php
>TA2 game:       http://totalannihilation2.com
>Flying Linux in space: http://projectmist.org
>
>_______________________________________________
>cobalt-security mailing list
>[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-security




_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com/intl.asp.

_______________________________________________
cobalt-security mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-security

Reply via email to