It has certain room for error, yes. I have however implemented ways of vetoing updates (but I have to know they should be veto'ed of course ;))
It's pretty difficult to follow your method on 40+ machines :) fre, 2002-06-28 kl. 16:51 skrev alan macdonald: > Hi, > > Just be very careful about this. > > Automatic updaters have the potential to download and install patches that > may break your machine. Glibc anyone? > > I have to say, I find it safer to update stuff with ssh + wget + > cobalt_upgrade manually. > > My $.02 > > At 16:37 28/06/2002 +0200, Martin wrote: > >You should be able to use my Updater script from cobalt-aid2.lindist.dk > >for this sort of thing. It has backends for everything from Qube2 > >(probably Qube1 also) to RaQ 550 (not tested, but it works on Qube3 and > >the RaQ 550 looks very similar). It is most often used on RaQ3 and RaQ4. > >[snip] > > rgds > > Alan MacDonald > -- > Webmaster - aceposition.com > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > +353 51 855 939 > > _______________________________________________ > cobalt-security mailing list > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-security -- Martin Moeller Liga LinDist ApS. Faelledvej 16D DK-2200 Copenhagen N Tel: +45 35 36 95 05 Fax: +45 35 36 92 05 http://www.liga.dk mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ cobalt-security mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-security
