At 10:03 AM 7/2/2002, you wrote: >Paul Jacobs did once again write something like: > > Would rather spend the money on a Apple OS 10 Server and put plesk on > > it. Or sun will have to drop there prices to compete with apple :) > >Thanks for that bit of marketing insight. >Was it related to cobalt security? >Was it even related to security? >So was I remotely interested in hearing it? >What say you?
No apology's. >We're all highly aware of how unimpressed you are with Sun/Cobalt, please >*please* find somewhere else to vent your frustration. Making the odd post >to a support list like this is not helping, it's just filling up everyone's >mailboxes with dross along the lines of: > >"Sun have abandoned all old Raq owners to an old kernel family!" >"Actually you can upgrade but it's unsupported because its so risky its >unsupportable. You need to really know what you're doing for the benefits to >outweigh the risks." >"Sun have abandoned all old Raq owners to an old kernel family!" >[repeat] All ture. >The only reason I don't plonk your emails is because, as you clearly know >your systems, sometimes you almost say something useful. Please try to up >your ratio of useful postings to "oh isn't it all terrible, someone should >do something" postings[1]. > >Rant ends, >Stephen > >[1] Of course, my ratio's dropping like a stone... :o) > >_______________________________________________ >cobalt-security mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-security _______________________________________________ cobalt-security mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-security
