Stephen wrote: >My understanding is that to upgrade to 2.4.x requires reflashing the BIOS >of the Raq, which can certainly be done, but has the risk of rendering the >Raq unbootable if it goes wrong.
>So Sun won't "approve" 2.4.x because then they'd be approving you breaking >your Raq and you might expect them to fix it. So they probably never will >"approve" it, but they certainly won't stop you. It'll break the warranty >but so do most necessary upgrades. Thanks Stephen, Wow, so just because they would have to require a reflashing of the BIOS, they back away ? Seems like with their resources, they could "run this through the wringer" in the lab and come up with SOMETHING, eh ? I've reflashed the BIOS on PC's (5 years ago we were buying a TON of HP PC's and found that each batch that came in and a different BIOS version and they all needed to be at a certain level or it was causing problems with something we were doing...). Is it that hard on a Raq ? Chuck _______________________________________________ cobalt-security mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-security
