marcus miller wrote: > so is 8.10.2 classed as an 8.10 release? or is it considered a release after > 8.10 and therefore insecure?
Please note that I've been reminded I just responded to an almost two-year old post <frown>. Presuming you've kept at all up to date, the sendmail running on our RaQs is secure. Jeff -- Jeff Lasman, nobaloney.net, P. O. Box 52672, Riverside, CA 92517 US Internet & Unix/Linux/Sun/Cobalt Consulting +1 909 778-9980 Our jblists address used on lists is for list email only To contact us offlist: "http://www.nobaloney.net/contactus.html"; _______________________________________________ cobalt-security mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://list.cobalt.com/mailman/listinfo/cobalt-security
