> Jasper Capel wrote:
> > Koelewijn, Marcel - Acision wrote:
> >
> >>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:cobbler-
> >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jasper Capel
> >>> Sent: woensdag 15 oktober 2008 23:01
> >>> To: cobbler mailing list
> >>> Subject: Advanced networking: ethernet bonding proposal
> >>>
> >>> Hey all,
> >>>
> >>> Now that the arbitrary interface name and VLAN stuff is done, I'd
> like
> >>> to add bonding support to Cobbler. I'd like to start with coming to
> an
> >>> agreement on how this should look from a CLI-perspective.
> >>>
> >>> I'd suggest the following:
> >>>
> >>> cobbler system edit --name=system1 --add-interface=bond0
> >>> --bonding=master --bonding-opts="miimon=100" --ip=192.168.0.1
> >>> --subnet=255.255.255.0 --gateway=192.168.0.254 --static=1
> >>> cobbler system edit --name=system1 --add-interface=slave0
> >>> --mac=aa:bb:cc:dd:ee:f0 --bonding=slave --bonding-master=bond0
> >>> cobbler system edit --name=system1 --add-interface=slave1
> >>> --mac=aa:bb:cc:dd:ee:f1 --bonding=slave --bonding-master=bond0
> >>>
> >>> I'd like to hear your thoughts on this. :)
> >>>
> >>> --Jasper
> >>>
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Would it be possible to combine the VLAN and trunking?
> >>
> >>
> > Combine it in what way? I assume you want to add VLANs to the newly
> > created bond0, that would be:
> > cobbler system edit --name=system1 --add-interface=bond0.10
> > --ip=10.1.1.1 --subnet=255.255.255.0
> > cobbler system edit --name=system2 --add-interface=bond0.11
> > --ip=10.1.2.1 --subnet=255.255.255.0

As long as this means that we can have a bond over VLAN 10 and 11 - that's 
indeed what the intention is.

> > True, but this was the best way I could think of to assure the
> > addressing ends up on the right physical interface... But, if you
> don't
> > want to configure all interfaces from the cobbler snippets, but just
> > want to make sure the installer-interface is configured correctly you
> > only have to define one interface in Cobbler, and solve the rest with
> > your other snippets (that's the way I'm doing this right now). An
> other
> > option is not to define /any/ MAC-addresses, it would (should? we
> might
> > want to test this) just fall back to DHCP for the installer, and you
> can
> > use your own snippets to configure your networking.
> > If you got any ideas on how this might be improved: I'm open to
> > suggestions! :)
> >
>
> Sounds like we have a reasonable amount of agreement.
>
> Make it so, and hopefully some folks can try it out and see how it
> works
> in practice?
>
I'll test it - no problems.

/marcel

This e-mail and any attachment is for authorised use by the intended 
recipient(s) only. It may contain proprietary material, confidential 
information and/or be subject to legal privilege. It should not be copied, 
disclosed to, retained or used by, any other party. If you are not an intended 
recipient then please promptly delete this e-mail and any attachment and all 
copies and inform the sender. Thank you.


_______________________________________________
cobbler mailing list
[email protected]
https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cobbler

Reply via email to