>> Finally, would we be looking at adding a manage_samba option then, since >> this requires packages to be shared via a CIFS mount? Some extra checks >> could be added to "cobbler check" to verify that's all installed. >> > > I would need to look at this further to tell. Haven't done so yet, but > in general it's not managing > samba generically but only for it's own purposes. > > I can see this having additional manual setup requirements and maybe a > boolean in settings > to enable it, plus some extra Wiki docs. TBD.
That's what I was thinking, another boolean with a templated config file for samba available in /etc/cobbler. This would put it in-line with dhcpd. >> Beyond that, the generation of response files is mainly what I wrote the >> templated config stuff for, so it should be fairly simple to implement > this >> as an import :) >> > > We might be able to treat them as an answer file directly (--kickstart) > for the most part. If they have more than > one file to generate, then yes. The issue here is the same as it is with Solaris: the file needs to be present on a share and can't be created on the fly - so it would have to be created during a sync. We could specify that the --kickstart file is the basis for this, but it would have to be generated on a sync (preferably only on a lite sync). -- This message has been scanned for viruses and dangerous content by MailScanner, and is believed to be clean. _______________________________________________ cobbler mailing list [email protected] https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cobbler
