Jasper Capel wrote: > Wouldn't it be better to see if eth0's bonding type is "slave", and get > the information from the associated bonding master device (I could call > it "moo" if I wanted) rather than checking for a bond0? > If that's not possible, disregard my comment, I'm not into this part of > the code. :) > > I think that's a good idea, I can work on that later.
Question, how do I know eth0 is the right place to look? As I understand we have arbitrary names now. Dave _______________________________________________ cobbler mailing list [email protected] https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/cobbler
